« Friday Trump & Politics Roundup - 22 | Main | Good Sources of Potassium »

Annoyed at Headlines - Star Trek Wasn't Prophetic on Brain Death

Starfleet LogoI know that science reporting ain't what it used to be. And even in the 'old days', when newspapers had decent sized science departments, headlines could be misleading. Still, the reporting on a recent study has irked me enough to become a cranky old man and call it out here on my blog.

Here are a few examples of the coverage. Pay attention to what those headlines are implying.

Here's how Vice summarized the findings of the study.

[Jans] Dreier works at the Charité Hospital in Berlin, one of Germany's leading university hospitals. In February, the 52-year-old and his colleague, Jed Hartings, published a study that details what happens to our brain at the point of death. It describes how the brain's neurons transmit electrical signals with full force one last time before they completely die off. Though this phenomenon, popularly known in the medical community as a "brain tsunami," had previously only been seen in animals, Dreier and Hartings were able to show it in humans as they died. Their work goes on to suggest that in certain circumstances, the process could be stopped entirely, theorizing that it could be done if enough oxygen is supplied to the brain before the cells are destroyed.

About 2/3 of the way through that Vice article, you find the following interview question and answer with the study author.

So how did you find out that an episode of Star Trek had predicted your findings 30 years ago?

My colleague, Jed Hartings, brought it to my attention after watching the scene and noticing how similar it is to our work. My best guess is that the creators of Star Trek must have found research at the time that detailed a similar process in animals. The first person to research these sort of brain waves was a Brazilian neurophysiologist who conducted studies on rabbits in the 1940s. All we've done is show it in humans, which has taken this long because medical research in general is an incredibly slow process.

So in reality, this is a process first studied in the 1940s. The big innovation in this study is that it was done on human subjects, rather that non-human animals, but it shouldn't be a shock at all that human brains function the same as other mammal brains. So, Star Trek's writers back in the '80s were just using an already known phenomenon in their script. You could praise the writers for getting the science right (because they didn't always), but it's not like they made some profound prediction that science is only now catching up with.

All this isn't to say that the new study isn't fascinating. Of course it's interesting to do this study on actual people instead of other animals. But it doesn't sound like it found anything that wasn't already expected.

Image Source: Wikimedia Commons


That why individuals instruct you to continue conversing with them while oblivious. The dead have been know to satisfy 5 mins after your eyes go. Which is generally why a white light is said to show up as a result of the loss of visual neural action which is really the absence of contribution through the eyes.

This fair fortifies my conviction that how beyond words how you encounter passing. The passing knowledge will be extraordinary in the event that one kicks the bucket from a heart assault versus in the event that one shoots themselves in the head. That is the reason we treat the body. A long time back individuals who were expected dead on the grounds that there was no heart beat were covered, in wooden boxes. A long time later some of them were dove up and found in positions that prosecuted they were endeavoring to escape the crate.

That’s not a heroic death; it's not by any means an especially deplorable one. You can contend that it has a certain didn't-see-that-coming verisimilitude with most real life fatalities, yet that is an argument that only goes so far.

brain loss of life is not the maximum commonplace manner docs diagnose loss of life in practice.The general public, says Lazar, die "due to the fact their hearts day-to-day or they everyday respiratory."

Earlier than the 1960s, in instances of mind damage death became reported handiest whilst the heart or lungs close down. But with the appearance of life support that would preserve the coronary heart and lungs working, some mind-injured sufferers could deteriorate every day the factor of getting medical daily of mind demise that might no longer were obvious with in advance treatment pro every day cols.

Post a comment


TrackBack URL for this entry:


Selling Out