« National Hot Dog Month | Main | The 2012 Texas Republican Platform »

Arguing on a Website - Explaining Evolution

Evolutionary TreeI didn't write much on the blog this week because I spent a few lunch breaks getting caught up in a discussion in the comments section of an article in the local paper. So, I'll do what I often do in these situations, and copy my comments here. It's a bit repetitious of other things I've written before, but due too the nature of comments, a bit briefer.

You should read the Letter to the Editor that kicked off the conversation first. Be warned that much of the discussion in the comments section degraded into name calling, triggered by the second letter at that link.

Here's my first comment.

Although I agree with much of the sentiment of Jim Edwards, I did see a few places where what he wrote is in need of correction, or where I might add a litte more information.

"First of all man did not evolve from apes."

Granted, this is a semantic issue, but it's one of my pet peeves. Humans did not evolve from any of the other extant apes, true. We didn't evolve from chimps or bonobos (they didn't evolve from us, either). We all three species share a common ancestor. Further back still, we share a common ancestor with gorillas, and even further back with orangutans. But if you were to get in a time machine and travel back to any of those common ancestors, whatever species they might be, they would still be referred to as apes. It would be like arguing that crows didn't evolve from birds, but only share a common ancestor with birds.

Regarding the time of the split, the current best estimate is around 6 million years between us and chimps & bonobos. The other apes split off from our lineage earlier than that. You have to go back around 20 million years for the split between old world monkeys and us apes, and back around 30 million years for the split with new world monkeys.

If you're really interested in the family tree, just google "primate phylogeny".

Regarding 'missing links', I'm not sure what people expect them to look like, but there are plenty of transitional fossils that have been found. To give just two examples, tiktaalik roseae is a great example of the transition from fish to tetrapods, and ambulocetus is a great example of the transition from terrestrial mammal to whale. But keep in mind that these examples don't rest solely on their own. You have to look at them in context of other fossils. For example, animals like Eustheopteron and Panderichthys are similar to Tiktaalik, but more fish like, while animals like Acanthostega and Ichtyostega are also similar, but more tetrapod like. On the human side, just google "talk origins hominid skulls", and you'll find a page showing skulls grading gradually from earlier hominid ancestors into us modern humans.

And my second:

tdgriffin wrote:

"I have no doubt that the DNA of apes and humans are similar. I wouldn't be surprised if doves and pigeons have similar DNA. They resemble each other. It doesn't prove they came from the same ancestor."

Why would our DNA be so very similar to that of a chimp's if not for common ancestry? Let me use an example. Most animals can make their own vitamin C. They don't need to eat foods high in the vitamin because their bodies simply synthesize it from the other molecules of the food they eat. Scientists have found the gene responsible for this, the L-gulano-γ-lactone oxidase gene. They've found a broken copy of this gene in humans. So the first question is, why would we have a broken copy of a gene, unless we inherited it from an ancestor with a functioning copy? Now, I know some creationists might say that maybe Adam and Eve did have functioning copies of this gene, and mutation crippled it. But guess what, scientists have also found this gene in chimps, macaques, and other primates, and it's broken in the same location as the human copy. So now you have to accept that this gene either just happened to mutate in the same location in all of these different animals, or that a creator intentionally put the same broken, non-functioning gene in all these animals, when it just makes so much more sense to assume that it mutated in a common ancestor of all these animals, which passed it on to all of its descendants.

(As to why a broken gene could have persisted in successful animals, if you're eating a diet rich in fruits and vegetables, it really won't hurt you if you can't make Vitamin C, so there's no selection pressure for those individuals with a working copy vs those with a broken copy.)

And L-gulano-γ-lactone oxidase isn't the only example. We share other pseudogenes with the great apes, and similarities in 'junk' DNA also match the pattern predicted by common ancestry.

And then my third and final comment:

in response to tdgriffin:
So, I take it you disagree with me? Oh well. But I still wonder why we, in our never ending quest for the perfect species, would hang onto a broken copy of an unnecessary gene over millions of years, since we and the apes decided to go our separate ways. When I break a cd, I chunk that bugger.

Another thing I wonder about, when I hear it mentioned: Just how many generations would it take for a black family living in New York to become white, or a white family living in South Africa to become black?

Natural selection only acts on beneficial or harmful traits. Beneficial traits allow an organism to have more offspring, so that trait becomes more common in a population. Harmful traits cause an organism to have less offspring, so that trait becomes less common in the population. Neutral traits aren't acted on by natural selection, and can persist (although, in the long run, neutral traits tend to deteriorate or drift just because there's no pressure from natural selection to maintain them). Also keep in mind, that there's no mechanism in our cells to do what you propose - cut out bad sections of DNA. Our cells just copy the DNA, making a few mistakes here and there in mutations. And of course, there's no conscious intent. You can't will your cells to cut out your broken L-gulano-γ-lactone oxidase gene in the sperm or eggs that you'll provide to your children.

So, some of our distant ancestors lived in an environment where they ate lots of fruit and vegetables, and got plenty of Vitamin C from their diet. When some mutation occurred that crippled Vitamin C synthesis, it didn't help or hurt that individual. Even if a mechanism existed to do it, cutting out the broken gene wouldn't have been noticeably beneficial. It was a neutral mutation. So, it didn't hurt that individual's chances of having offspring, and the broken gene began to spread.

But now there is an interesting question - if the broken gene wasn't beneficial, how did it become so widespread as to become fixed in the entire population? Here's where it's good to remember that populations are composed of individuals, and that sometimes a little bit of chance comes into play. From time to time, there will be population bottlenecks. This may be due to hard times that kill off most of a population, or from a small group becoming isolated and then developing into a new species. So when you get down to those small population sizes, chance plays a big role in which versions of genes are present and, and consequently which will persist in that population. (You can read more about this on Wikipedia under 'Founder Effect': http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Founder_Effect

As to the question of skin color, I honestly don't know, but I suspect that in modern times, it might not happen at all. Remember that in evolutionary terms, 'fitness' merely means successfully leaving offspring. And for natural selection to act on a trait, it has to result in individuals having either more or less children than other individuals with different traits. In modern day New York City or modern day South Africa, where much of people's lives are spent indoors, and where dietary supplements are readily available for those with Vitamin D deficiencies, I doubt there's any strong selection pressure on skin pigment.

Comments

I stuck around to read more. :)

On evolution, just a couple of comments. For one, it's sometimes forgotten that opponents can poke as many holes in evolution theory as they like—and should be encouraged to, that's good science—but even if they succeed it doesn't add even a featherweight to whatever loony alternative they're peddling. It just leads to more science—a process of learning that they've already validated by engaging in it.

True, we're not descended from apes. It's more like they're the distant cousins we try not to invite to weddings because they'll wreck the place. (We all have cousins like that, right? Second cousins? How about seventeenth? You know they're out there.)

Evolution is an observed fact like gravity. Our struggle lies in explaining it. Our inability to reflects our frailities not the existence of God (nor does science disprove God—it can't). Our inability to understand something does not prove it can't be understood; humans simply aren't that smart. (Try going back a hundred years to explain a Higgs boson to someone.)

Last, Vitamin D is a fascinating explanation for changes in skin color with northern migration in a very short time frame. Women severely deficient in Vitamin D have severe problems with childbearing and that may well have driven the change to a skin color that provides more of the vitamin but poor protection against melanoma.

*However* modern dietary sources are almost certainly not sufficient to allow for zero exposure to the Sun. I take 5,000-10,000 IU/day (versus the RDA of 400 IU, a number picked decades ago and still more than most of us get anyway) to reach a normal blood level. Perhaps 90% of us modern indoor types are deficient. Vitamin D, my doctor mentioned, is now implicated in the expression of 200 different genes affecting everything from bipolar disorder to heart disease, besides the well-known role in calcium uptake.

atorvastatin 40mg brand order atorvastatin 80mg online cheap atorvastatin 40mg uk

brand ciprofloxacin - buy cephalexin 500mg pills augmentin 375mg drug

cheap cipro 1000mg - generic cephalexin 500mg order generic augmentin

generic ciplox - order ciprofloxacin 500 mg erythromycin 500mg uk

metronidazole generic - oral cleocin 150mg buy zithromax pills for sale

covid and ivermectin - cefixime 100mg ca generic tetracycline 250mg

ivermectin 3mg pills - buy aczone medication order tetracycline 250mg

buy valtrex for sale - order nateglinide 120mg pills buy acyclovir 800mg for sale

buy acillin without prescription buy ampicillin tablets order amoxil online cheap

order flagyl 200mg online - order zithromax 500mg online cheap purchase azithromycin online

buy lasix sale - minipress 1mg usa captopril 25 mg pill

glycomet 1000mg sale - cheap trimethoprim lincocin order online

zidovudine 300mg pill - brand allopurinol

clozapine 100mg cheap - generic famotidine 20mg famotidine price

order generic quetiapine 100mg - buy geodon 80mg online cheap order eskalith generic

cost anafranil 50mg - cost remeron 15mg sinequan 25mg ca

buy hydroxyzine - buy endep 10mg pill buy generic amitriptyline

augmentin 625mg usa - ethambutol price ciprofloxacin 1000mg ca

buy amoxil - order erythromycin 500mg generic purchase cipro sale

purchase azithromycin sale - buy floxin generic ciplox 500mg uk

buy cleocin generic - order monodox for sale chloromycetin online buy

ivermectin online - cefaclor ca buy generic cefaclor for sale

strongest over the counter antihistamine - seroflo price buy theophylline generic

medrol 8 mg tablets - medrol 4mg tablet astelin where to buy

clarinex 5mg brand - aristocort 10mg oral order albuterol online cheap

glucophage 500mg generic - order precose 50mg pills acarbose price

how to buy micronase - glipizide 5mg drug forxiga cost

prandin 2mg sale - empagliflozin medication order empagliflozin 25mg generic

semaglutide 14mg ca - cheap glucovance order DDAVP generic

buy terbinafine without prescription - cheap lamisil 250mg griseofulvin pills

buy ketoconazole 200mg - ketoconazole over the counter cost sporanox 100mg

order famciclovir 250mg generic - acyclovir 400mg generic valcivir oral

lanoxin order - verapamil 120mg cheap furosemide 40mg oral

purchase metoprolol pill - buy propranolol online buy nifedipine 30mg generic

cheap microzide - hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg cheap buy bisoprolol 5mg generic

nitroglycerin for sale online - lozol sale brand valsartan

simvastatin afford - lipitor way lipitor ministry

rosuvastatin pills yawn - pravastatin 10mg uk caduet twitch

asthma treatment monstrous - asthma treatment plunge asthma treatment dale

acne medication public - acne medication matter acne medication west

pills for treat prostatitis space - prostatitis medications pose prostatitis pills night

uti medication pitch - uti treatment fright treatment for uti nay

loratadine medication scramble - claritin coil claritin husband

Post a comment


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.jefflewis.net/blog/jlnet-tb.cgi/510

Archives

Selling Out